Dr. Yin's Animal Behavior and Medicine Blog
Raw Food Dog Diet
Posted On: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010
By Sophia Yin, DVM, MS

Q) I have a dog and 2 cats on a homemade raw diet made under recommendation of a holistic vet. I grind whole chickens with bone and skin, raw veggies and add vitamins and essential fatty acids. I have been doing this for about 3 years and my pets have well formed stools and shiny coats. My dog started all of this because of skin allergies which since have disappeared. What is your advice on raw diets?
A) While the majority of pet owners use commercial pet foods, others opt for diets that seem more natural. The idea behind diets of uncooked cuisine is that since dogs and cats evolved on raw foods, especially meat, these raw food diets must be the best. And that since cooking is known to destroy some vitamins such as thiamine and possibly some unknown compounds, that commercial diets aren’t as nutritionally sound.
Most traditional veterinarians discourage such homemade diets though. They warn against the dangers of parasites and bacteria growing rampant in raw foods and the evils of bones getting stuck in stomach or intestines. But if your pet’s on a back-to-the-basics diet and doing great who would argue with results?
It turns out that any board certified veterinary nutritionist would. According to Dr. Sean Delaney, current Chair of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition and previous small animal clinical nutritionist at UC Davis, the risk of obstruction, parasitic infection, or bacterial infection is real.
“I recall seeing an adult Chihuahua on a raw food diet that included whole bone,” says Delaney, “He came in on emergency because he couldn’t eat and he was making choking sounds.” Radiographs of his neck showed a bone stuck in his esophagus.
Delaney also points out that there are many veterinary reports of animals on these diets coming in with bacterial blood infections. Additionally an outbreak of Salmonella in humans in Canada was traced back to dogs that had eaten treats infected with the bacteria even though these dogs had no clinical signs themselves. Similarly, using raw food diets puts children and immuno-compromised individuals at risk.
But perhaps to a nutritionist, the major concern with these raw diets is that they are not nutritionally balanced. According to a report in the The Journal of Veterinary Medical Association, when veterinary nutritionists at Tufts tested three homemade raw food diets —the BARF diet, the Ultimate diet and the Volhard diet, all showed serious imbalances.
Says Delaney, “Raw food diets most commonly deficient in calcium and phosphorus even if bone is included because calcium can be poorly absorbed from whole bone.” In fact the Chihuahua with the obstruction had been on this diet for a year and had osteopenia, or thinning of the bones.
While this little guy had no fractures, fractures due to calcium or phosphorus imbalance are not rare. Recently Delaney examined a kitten (one of three kittens similarly affected) on a raw food diet that had come in for lameness.
“X-rays showed that it had a fractured femur (a bone in the thigh) and pelvis due to thinning of the bones,” says Delaney. “We put them on a commercial kitten diet and within a couple of days the generalized lameness went away.” Within several weeks the lameness due to the fractures went away and by six weeks the fractures were healed and the bone was back to normal density.
Delaney admits that grinding the bone can solve the obstruction problem and greatly improve the calcium and phosphorus imbalances, but it doesn’t solve the other nutritional problems.
“Even with the most careful preparation these diets have deficiencies in nutrients,” he states. Wild cats and dogs eat their whole prey including the liver, intestines, skin and fur so they get all the nutrients they need.
Interestingly, because the meat-based raw diets are high in fat, pets have a lustrous coat. The diets still aren’t as high in fat as prey items such as mice which may be comprised of 50% fat. Thus pets may still not get enough of the essential fatty acids, but supplementation can take care of this and can also improve certain skin conditions. Additionally these diets may lack in taurine, an amino acid cats need that’s high in whole mice but not adequate in many meats.
Diets are often also lacking sources for all of the vitamins and frequently contain no source of trace metals such as zinc, iron and copper. Without these the pet will develop an anemia which you might notice as a vague decline in athletic performance but would only discover on blood work.
Even if nutritionists find all the required elements in these homemade diets they may not be balanced. This is complicated by the fact that excess levels of one compound such as zinc may cause depletion of another such as copper.
So what do nutritionists recommend? Commercial diets are their first choice. Choose one that’s AAFCO certified as balanced using feeding trials.
Delaney adds, “Owners perceive commercial foods as having things they aren’t comfortable with such as by-products. Interestingly, since dogs and cats in the wild eat their prey whole, by products are probably closer to what animals would eat in the wild rather than a diet composed primarily of flesh meat.”
People who want to prepare their pet’s meals or whose pets have medical conditions such as food allergies, that require special diets, should have their diets formulated by a board certified veterinary nutritionist and should always cook their meat.
For recommendations on nutritionists, contact the American College of Veterinary Nutrition or the American Academy of Veterinary Nutrition.
To have a custom homemade diet designed for your pet, visit the following websites:
Modified from an article originally appearing in the San Francisco Chronicle in 2004.
Comments
Raw feeders that know what they're doing always feed a proper ratio of bone/offal/muscle content. Feeding raw is not so simple as to thrown down a pound of ground beef and a chicken neck. It's unfortunate that veterinarians continue to force foods that are AAFCO certified (like Iams and Science Diet) down our throats while scaring people with the minimal risk of feeding raw if you do it properly.
Is it time consuming, yes. Is it wrong to feed kibble? Most definitely not! There are some excellent kibbles out there. But what did nature intend for your dog? I can assure you it's not heavily processed corn and wheat gluten.
Until commercial diets become better in quality I couldn't imagine feeding them. Currently I don't believe pet owners have good choices available to them. In the meantime I will continue to feed raw. My protein comes from organic, grass fed livestock and is local. Anyone who feeds raw needs to be vigilant about their protein sources just as they should be for their own meat.
I also believe every dog is different. I have seen dogs thrive on certain diets while others can't eat them. Pet owners should try a variety of foods and choose what's best for their pets. If you are feeding raw regular trips to the vet to check blood work and general health are imperative because it's easier for owners to make mistakes.
This article is evocative and tries to sway the reader with strong rhetoric veiled as facts. For example, the outbreak of salmonella in contaminated Canadian treats vaguely sited has no mention of whether or not it came from a raw food source.
I'm actually surprised, well saddened really, that someone with such a sophisticated way of thinking about animal behavior would post this article.
There are some major logical fallacies presented in this article as reasons for not feeding raw. Besides the elephant in the room of how prior to the creation of commercialized pet food in the 1950s dogs thrived for thousands of years, the actual scientific studies of raw feeding animals cautions even just cooking fresh foods. Pottenger’s ten year cat colony studies come readily to mind.
More importantly, pets die from contaminated commercially "cooked" prepared pet food because of deplorable standards and practices approved and governed by AAFCO. There feeding trials are not scientifically sound. AAFCO approves companies such as Gravy Train, Little Cesars, Alpo, and Ol’ Roy. The average person can deduce that fresh prepared foods would be a healthier option for any living being. What human doctor would recommend that for the rest of your life you can only eat things out of packaging able to sit at room temperature on the shelf in the grocery store.
I sincerely hope you re-evaluate the content of this article.
I'm sorry that I have not come to the same conclusion/the popular conclusion that you have come to. The fact is that I attend several veterinary conferences per year and generally at each conference a veterinary nutritionist talks about raw food diets. To date, no board certified veterinary nutritionists recommend raw food diets and each time I interview nutritionists they present me with case studies illustrating the reasons why.
Additionally, while an unusually high amount of commercial foods have undergone voluntary recalls due to high counts of salmonella ( in which outbreaks did not necessarily occur), most raw food has salmonella and other bacteria that can be transmitted to immunocompromised humans. If in individual wants to take that risk, then that is fine for the individual. As a veterinarian, it would be irresponsible for me to pretend that the risk is the same for raw and commercial foods.
To read a Public Health veterinarian's answers to common questions about raw food, go to Dr. Scott Meese's Wormsandgermsblog.
I know first hand how imbedded large corporations are within veterinary "science" and that independent funding is virtually nonexistent. Board certified veterinary nutritionists are certified by whom with funding from whom? What long term unbiased scientific studies have been done that they have as evidence? What case studies do you speak of? And what studies examine the transmission of pathogens from raw fed dogs or cats to humans?
Do you have any knowledge or comprehension of the Pottenger's cat study? The study was conducted before commercialized pet foods and over the course of ten years with more than 900 subjects and three generations. He started studying the effects of raw versus cooked meat because of the noticeable healthy benefits to his research animals he was using for an entirely different purpose. The study concluded that the animals actually physically deteriorated because of cooked food.
And I’m really curious; do the wolves you've interacted with eat Science Diet at the sanctuary?
This is all coming from the vested commercial interests who like to push the twin agendas of fear and convenience.
As a International Board Certified Lactation Consultant I see the same sorts of issues formula marketing undermining breastfeeding. Where there's a corporate interest, there will always be messages of 'but that MIGHT not be safe!' and 'THIS is scientific!', all touted by stern looking people in white coats.
FTR, I have 2 pets on raw, 1 on kibble, and 1 on canned. I'm not an 'evangelical' raw feeder; it's not for everyone, and commercially prepared foods can be suitable for many animals.
I am glad I have vets who are supportive of raw feeding & just roll their eyes at the official position statement of their professional organizations.
Arguing the health of kibble or canned over improperly fed raw is hardly a fair argument, is it?
To say "yes, I do see merit in a properly prepared, balanced raw diet" is to open oneself to law suits from everything that could (but doesn't always) go wrong. I'm guessing there must be some vets out there that feed raw. Where are they?
Are there any studies out there that support the anecdotal claims raw feeders have? That their dog made a complete 360 when it started raw? I'm guessing not, since a large dog food company would have to fund it.
Raw is certainly NOT all bad, and what dog owner who is well-informed these days about nutrition, vaccines, etc. would think that a "board-certified veterinary specialist" should be trusted? There are nutritionists that are NOT veterinarians and NOT propagandized/board certified, and they are not as one-sided and blinkered as you are. Let's face it, most veterinarians have been virtually bought out by the big companies selling crummy food and poisons (year-round hearworm, anti-flea toxins, etc.) with which to kill - er, "protect" - our pets. They have become legalized drug pushers. This keeps the "cha-ching" going at veterinarian clinics, and only the holistic vets do not push this stuff at the expense of our precious companions.
I urge anyone to google "The Truth about" vaccines, heartworm, etc., and look up the book and websites for "Scared Poopless" to keep informed about what the veterinary profession and big pet companies do NOT want you to know about the best care for your pets.
Add Your Own Comment:
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.- Search the Blog

- Browse Recent Articles
- Browse Categories
| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 |



